Since the resurrection is a historical claim, it cannot be adjudicated in the courts of science.

“In short, this author [Luke] should be placed along with the greatest of historians.” 

The common denominator between the ancients and the moderns is the lust for power.

While there is debate over the precise year that Jesus died, most scholars agree that this event fell within these two bookends—prophesied about five centuries earlier!

Perhaps most surprisingly, the Messiah was prophetically portrayed as a suffering servant.

This is not a case of Christians looking backward and reading messianic interpretations into these Scriptures.

The New Testament accounts are full of details that would have been very embarrassing to the apostles.

Who would die for a cause they knew to be false?

Paul is citing a creedal statement that had been circulating among believers since the resurrection, probably a gap of less than five years following the event.

This biblical claim of supernatural co-authorship is unique in literature and is the reason believers reverently refer to the Bible as the Word of God.

Most importantly, they want to determine whether the differences among these copied manuscripts undermine any core Christian doctrines. 

For the next several weeks, I will address the truth of Christianity by dealing with some common objections.

Truth is found in a relationship with Jesus. Only in this way will we be spared eternal separation from God. 

The risk associated with any search for truth is a function of the answers to three important questions concerning the information unearthed by the search.

In brief, the success of the trip validated the power of conveying truth through relationships.

I have decided to take a few weeks off publishing my blog and will resume on Wednesday May 3rd.

It is simply common sense that any country, culture or organization divided against itself will ultimately collapse.

…chronological snobbery - the past is passé - is ubiquitous.

Given their secular perspective, many leaders regard Jesus’ views on morality as past their “best before” date.